Information and Consultation
Feed-icon-24x24

05 October 12

I Mattu v University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 641 (2012) EMPLR 148

 

Information and Consultation - Article 6 of ECHR

18 May 2012

Court of Appeal

Stanley Burnton LJ

Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights guarantees a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal. In some cases, to ensure ‘equality of arms', this may require legal representation to be available. It applies to criminal proceedings and proceedings to determine civil rights.

Previous cases have established that Art 6 does not normally apply to disciplinary proceedings, but that it may do if those proceedings could affect a person's right to carry on their profession. If it applies, then Art 6 requires there to be a public hearing by an independent panel. In this case, the Court of Appeal holds that Article 6 is not engaged if an adverse outcome of the hearing merely makes it extremely difficult to get other employment within the profession.

Dr M complained that disciplinary proceedings following his alleged failure to follow instructions did not comply with Art 6. He complained that the panel was not independent and impartial.

The Court of Appeal held that Art 6 only applies if the hearing actually determines, or is likely to have a major influence on other proceedings which will determine, the right to carry on a profession. It referred, as an example, to R(G), where disciplinary proceedings against a teaching assistant accused of an inappropriate relationship with a boy would have had a major influence on the Independent Safeguarding Authority and would almost certainly had led to his disqualification from ever again acting in that capacity.

To view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Employment Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).

To request a free trial click here and select Jordans Employment Law online from the drop down menu

02 May 12

USA v Nolan [2011] IRLR 40

Handling Redundancies

9 November 2010

Court of Appeal

Laws, Hooper, Rimer LJJ

The question of when the obligation arises to consult employee representatives over redundancies has been referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union.

To read the full case summary and to view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Employment Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).

To request a free trial click here and select Jordans Employment Law online from the drop down menu.

02 May 12

Lancaster University v University and College Union [2011] IRLR 4

Information and Consultation

27 October 2010

Employment Appeal Tribunal

Ansell J; Ms J L P Drake CBE; Mrs D M Palmer

Collective consultation over 20 or more redundancies is required even where it would be futile; and futility is not a reason for reducing the award for failing to consult. ‘Redundancy' for these purposes includes the expiry of fixed term contracts.

To read the full case summary and to view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Employment Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).

To request a free trial click here and select Jordans Employment Law online from the drop down menu.